Farm Subsidy information
Aurora County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 526
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $18,466,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gene Raymond Hoefert | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $21,302 |
102 | Todd Prangley | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $21,205 |
103 | Thomas Pavlin | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $21,182 |
104 | Corey Plamp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $21,128 |
105 | Gary Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $21,112 |
106 | Angelita Farrell | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $20,827 |
107 | David Tuttle | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $20,759 |
108 | Hetland Farms Inc | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $20,500 |
109 | David Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $20,392 |
110 | Rick L Tobin | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $20,184 |
111 | Katherine Anne Pollard | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $19,923 |
112 | Iverson Farms Llp | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $19,600 |
113 | Colte Haines | White Lake, SD 57383 | $19,314 |
114 | Christopher L Fink | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $19,219 |
115 | Paul Eugene Matzner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $19,046 |
116 | Myron Donker | Stickney, SD 57375 | $18,886 |
117 | Robert Paul Ziebart | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $18,825 |
118 | Scott Kirsch | White Lake, SD 57383 | $18,733 |
119 | Robert Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $18,496 |
120 | Daniel R Prien | Stickney, SD 57375 | $18,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”