Total Conservation Programs in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 215
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $1,477,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Joyce R Hoefert | Hartford, SD 57033 | $3,839 |
102 | Richard Kieffer Revocable Living Trust | White Lake, SD 57383 | $3,808 |
103 | Ten High Partnership | Worthington, MN 56187 | $3,801 |
104 | John Kieffer | White Lake, SD 57383 | $3,778 |
105 | Margo Sommerfeld | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $3,778 |
106 | John D Fraser | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,702 |
107 | Ronald L Glissendorf | White Lake, SD 57383 | $3,541 |
108 | William R Lurken | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,532 |
109 | Paul Alfred Hettinger | White Lake, SD 57383 | $3,512 |
110 | Owen Glissendorf | White Lake, SD 57383 | $3,464 |
111 | , | $3,420 | |
112 | Charles Niles | Tea, SD 57064 | $3,367 |
113 | David Reinesch | White Lake, SD 57383 | $3,187 |
114 | Randy Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $3,090 |
115 | Merlin Konechne | White Lake, SD 57383 | $2,903 |
116 | Timothy P Thiry | White Lake, SD 57383 | $2,877 |
117 | Marlo Wieman | Canistota, SD 57012 | $2,834 |
118 | Mary Ellen Bjorkman - Mary Ellen Bjorkman Revocabl | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $2,769 |
119 | Stickfort Farms LLC | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $2,629 |
120 | Alan W Bjorkman | Burlington, WI 53105 | $2,477 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”