Farm Subsidy information
Aurora County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 513
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $25,212,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Curtis James Plamp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $24,599 |
122 | S & G Farm Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $23,696 |
123 | Isaac Johnson | Letcher, SD 57359 | $23,688 |
124 | James Guenthner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $23,074 |
125 | Jcw Farms LLC | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $23,007 |
126 | Steven Lee Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $22,909 |
127 | Lance Keizer | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $22,821 |
128 | Carl Hauert | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $22,522 |
129 | Preston O'day | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $22,479 |
130 | Dennis Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $22,151 |
131 | Dennis J Koerner Living Trust | Freeman, SD 57029 | $21,799 |
132 | Katherine Anne Pollard | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $21,650 |
133 | Shannon Gustave Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $21,406 |
134 | Iverson Farms Llp | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $21,025 |
135 | David Tuttle | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $20,759 |
136 | Thomas John Guenthner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $20,665 |
137 | Dustin Ludens | Geddes, SD 57342 | $20,539 |
138 | Lennis Boyd | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $20,424 |
139 | Alan L Bruinsma | Stickney, SD 57375 | $20,020 |
140 | Brian Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $19,776 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”