Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 242
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $1,393,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Dennis Beckmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $2,262 |
142 | Duane Jay Wolbrink | Stickney, SD 57375 | $2,242 |
143 | Terry Hoffman | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $2,144 |
144 | Rendell Breukelman | Platte, SD 57369 | $2,139 |
145 | Bert Fink | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $2,105 |
146 | David Glen Hargens | Stickney, SD 57375 | $2,050 |
147 | Michael Lee Hargens | Stickney, SD 57375 | $2,050 |
148 | Benjamin Bogenhagen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $2,035 |
149 | Robert Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,973 |
150 | Eric Nowotny | White Lake, SD 57383 | $1,953 |
151 | Travis Grieve | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,949 |
152 | Jesse Kirsch | White Lake, SD 57383 | $1,878 |
153 | Culley Tobin | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $1,844 |
154 | John Saville | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,770 |
155 | Wayne Tatro | White Lake, SD 57383 | $1,762 |
156 | Aaron Hettinger | White Lake, SD 57383 | $1,710 |
157 | Chuck Faulhaber | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,695 |
158 | Benjamin Donker | White Lake, SD 57383 | $1,691 |
159 | Greg Steele | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,684 |
160 | Daniel L Vandrongelen | Stickney, SD 57375 | $1,621 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”