Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 396
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $2,247,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Gary Dewaard | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,628 |
142 | Philip Edward Schmidt | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,615 |
143 | Delayne Persson | Corsica, SD 57328 | $5,564 |
144 | Lloyd Persson | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,541 |
145 | Donald F Beckman | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,527 |
146 | William Downey Anderson III | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,508 |
147 | Jim Munsen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,475 |
148 | Myron Hawkins | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $5,474 |
149 | Mark Allen Meier | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $5,466 |
150 | John Vangorp | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,392 |
151 | John Mathew Steichen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,388 |
152 | Vernon Charles Heidinger | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,302 |
153 | Edward O Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,276 |
154 | Lance Keizer | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,251 |
155 | Dale Gerlach | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,133 |
156 | Carl Greene | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,129 |
157 | Paul Eugene Matzner | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,069 |
158 | James Gardner | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,045 |
159 | Dale A Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,013 |
160 | Ralph Schoenfelder | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $4,975 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”