Farm Subsidy information

Aurora County, South Dakota

Total Subsidies in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,714

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $329,138,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Mayclin Farms PartnershipPlankinton, SD 57368$8,097,674
2Edinger Brothers PartnershipMitchell, SD 57301$2,130,854
3Randy BormannStickney, SD 57375$1,711,840
4Production PlusWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,659,986
5Sheldon Lee TobinPlankinton, SD 57368$1,645,374
6Dennis Marlin AshwillPlankinton, SD 57368$1,544,230
7Wayne Robert KleinSioux Falls, SD 57108$1,537,160
8Curtis Leo GillenWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,508,190
9Van Dusseldorp Ag EnterprisesPlatte, SD 57369$1,495,955
10Ronald L GlissendorfWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,449,808
11Gregory KroupaWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,405,696
12Vernon Lee NilesWessington Springs, SD 57382$1,301,249
13Louise Ann GillenWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,294,230
14John Arlyn NydamStickney, SD 57375$1,265,508
15Steven Lee MohnenWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,246,262
16Rodney L FaulhaberWessington Springs, SD 57382$1,223,305
17Paul BorgmannWhite Lake, SD 57383$1,197,756
18Tracy VangorpPlankinton, SD 57368$1,097,976
19Douglas VangorpStickney, SD 57375$1,073,255
20Johnson FarmsPlankinton, SD 57368$1,059,879

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag