Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 21
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $175,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mayclin Farms Partnership | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $87,866 |
2 | Louise Ann Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $16,840 |
3 | Sheryl J Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $12,322 |
4 | Jolene Marie Baker | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $11,275 |
5 | Jess A Wieczorek | Stickney, SD 57375 | $11,209 |
6 | Troy Kirsch | Platte, SD 57369 | $8,772 |
7 | Joel Prien | Stickney, SD 57375 | $6,855 |
8 | Joseph Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $4,494 |
9 | Scott Kirsch | White Lake, SD 57383 | $3,727 |
10 | Katherine Anne Pollard | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $2,330 |
11 | Benjamin Bogenhagen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $2,095 |
12 | Ben Konechne | White Lake, SD 57383 | $1,654 |
13 | Roger Vearrier | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $1,118 |
14 | , | $1,019 | |
15 | Konechne Enterprises LLC | White Lake, SD 57383 | $800 |
16 | Alan L Bruinsma | Stickney, SD 57375 | $768 |
17 | Winston Nowotny | White Lake, SD 57383 | $446 |
18 | Seth Hohbach | White Lake, SD 57383 | $404 |
19 | Matthew Todd Mulder | White Lake, SD 57383 | $363 |
20 | Ryas Larioza Olson | Canistota, SD 57012 | $237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>