Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 188
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $4,426,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $49,487 |
22 | Michael D Gilbertz | White Lake, SD 57383 | $49,480 |
23 | Robert Bruns | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $48,435 |
24 | Tracy Vangorp | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $46,730 |
25 | Matthew Allen Meier | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $42,832 |
26 | David Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $39,522 |
27 | Randy Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $38,690 |
28 | Ronnie Prien | Stickney, SD 57375 | $38,530 |
29 | Douglas Vangorp | Stickney, SD 57375 | $37,769 |
30 | John Christopher | Letcher, SD 57359 | $37,351 |
31 | Pamela Christopher | Letcher, SD 57359 | $37,351 |
32 | James Allen Johnson | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $37,121 |
33 | Joseph Koch | Stickney, SD 57375 | $36,763 |
34 | Vernon Lee Niles | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $36,521 |
35 | Randall Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $34,708 |
36 | Harris Cattle Co | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $33,929 |
37 | Dwight Johnson | Letcher, SD 57359 | $32,395 |
38 | Myron Lee Baanhofman | Stickney, SD 57375 | $32,285 |
39 | Chuck Faulhaber | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $31,704 |
40 | Richard Kieffer Revocable Living Trust | White Lake, SD 57383 | $31,447 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”