Conservation Reserve Program in Aurora County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 572
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $23,986,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ten High Partnership | Worthington, MN 56187 | $134,139 |
42 | Timothy Larson | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $133,395 |
43 | Ron Nydam | Stickney, SD 57375 | $129,834 |
44 | Betty Schoenfelder Living Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $129,227 |
45 | Platte Lake Limited Partnership | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $127,745 |
46 | Andy Espedal | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $127,588 |
47 | Gerald M Hoffman | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $127,474 |
48 | Darlene Palmer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $127,335 |
49 | Jane Knippling | Hartford, SD 57033 | $126,974 |
50 | Richard Kieffer Revocable Living Trust | White Lake, SD 57383 | $125,448 |
51 | Doris Anderson | Stickney, SD 57375 | $125,315 |
52 | Johnson Farms | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $124,691 |
53 | Iverson Farms Llp | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $123,465 |
54 | Dale A Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $122,950 |
55 | Shogun Investment Partnership Llp | White Lake, SD 57383 | $122,699 |
56 | Josephine Howard Barrows | Versailles, KY 40383 | $119,216 |
57 | Ringneck Acres Family Limited Partnership | Mankato, MN 56001 | $118,896 |
58 | Ronald K Miller | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $118,766 |
59 | James D Robertson | Canistota, SD 57012 | $115,028 |
60 | Keith Heezen | Faribault, MN 55021 | $114,577 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”