Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 258
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $1,206,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheldon Lee Tobin | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $39,836 |
| 2 | Gregory Kroupa | White Lake, SD 57383 | $35,253 |
| 3 | , | $25,266 | |
| 4 | Vernon Lee Niles | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $24,537 |
| 5 | Robert Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $21,501 |
| 6 | Dale James Peters | White Lake, SD 57383 | $18,279 |
| 7 | Robert Bruns | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $17,676 |
| 8 | Jamie Lee Heidinger | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $17,381 |
| 9 | Vince Johnson | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $16,836 |
| 10 | Randall Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $16,350 |
| 11 | David Reinesch | White Lake, SD 57383 | $15,766 |
| 12 | James A Mccord | White Lake, SD 57383 | $15,099 |
| 13 | Rodney Schabot | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $14,142 |
| 14 | Richard Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $13,983 |
| 15 | Rustin Robert Bruns | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $13,185 |
| 16 | Paul Borgmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $12,487 |
| 17 | Eric Joseph Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $12,318 |
| 18 | Daniel W Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $12,318 |
| 19 | Joseph Koch | Stickney, SD 57375 | $11,997 |
| 20 | Louise Ann Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $11,610 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
