Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 288
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $537,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gregory Kroupa | White Lake, SD 57383 | $16,022 |
2 | Sheldon Lee Tobin | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $15,110 |
3 | , | $13,094 | |
4 | Vernon Lee Niles | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $10,993 |
5 | Perry Darwin Tobin | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $10,467 |
6 | Robert Bruns | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $9,731 |
7 | Robert Mohnen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $8,651 |
8 | Dale James Peters | White Lake, SD 57383 | $8,453 |
9 | Matthew Todd Mulder | White Lake, SD 57383 | $7,824 |
10 | Randall Mcqueen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $7,381 |
11 | Vince Johnson | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $7,326 |
12 | James A Mccord | White Lake, SD 57383 | $6,566 |
13 | Rustin Robert Bruns | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $6,116 |
14 | Eric Joseph Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,809 |
15 | Daniel W Bosworth | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,809 |
16 | Bradley Hohbach | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,745 |
17 | Rodney Schabot | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,558 |
18 | Joseph Koch | Stickney, SD 57375 | $5,410 |
19 | Harris Cattle Co | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $5,400 |
20 | Louise Ann Gillen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $5,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>