Total Commodity Programs in Aurora County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 135
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Aurora County, South Dakota totaled $124,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | , | $44,832 | |
2 | Thomas Pavlin | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $20,123 |
3 | Reid Daniel Suelflow | White Lake, SD 57383 | $11,421 |
4 | Swenson Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $4,274 |
5 | Robert Koch | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $3,228 |
6 | Mhc Land And Cattle Ltd Dba Christiansen Land & C | Kimball, SD 57355 | $2,441 |
7 | Harris Cattle Co | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $2,426 |
8 | Wieczorek Cattle LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $2,418 |
9 | John Arlyn Nydam | Stickney, SD 57375 | $1,083 |
10 | Kenneth J Vanbrenk | Stickney, SD 57375 | $1,039 |
11 | Dale James Peters | White Lake, SD 57383 | $951 |
12 | Ronald Wayne Steffen | White Lake, SD 57383 | $933 |
13 | James Headley | White Lake, SD 57383 | $913 |
14 | Glenn G Gerlach | Dimock, SD 57331 | $906 |
15 | Jess A Wieczorek | Stickney, SD 57375 | $893 |
16 | Douglas L Beckmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $856 |
17 | Dennis Beckmann | White Lake, SD 57383 | $809 |
18 | Iverson Farms Llp | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $809 |
19 | Richard M Markhardt | White Lake, SD 57383 | $789 |
20 | S & G Farm Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>