Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Beadle County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Beadle County, South Dakota totaled $203,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chase Gregory Binger | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $1,453 |
22 | Ryne Robert Andrew Johnson | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $1,370 |
23 | Nathan Paul Irving Johnson | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $1,353 |
24 | Chase Von Eye | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $1,192 |
25 | Cole W Nickels | Wessington, SD 57381 | $1,172 |
26 | , | $1,081 | |
27 | Ty Leon Moser | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $1,068 |
28 | Hunter Johnson | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $1,031 |
29 | John Alan Hamilton | Wessington, SD 57381 | $872 |
30 | Caleb Hofer | Yale, SD 57386 | $798 |
31 | Grant Scott Hamilton | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $787 |
32 | Matthew Arbeiter | Huron, SD 57350 | $608 |
33 | White Side Feeders LLC | Wessington, SD 57381 | $459 |
34 | Zane Wuestewald | Wessington, SD 57381 | $446 |
35 | Christian Jacob Boomsma | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $388 |
36 | Mark Puterbaugh | Huron, SD 57350 | $308 |
37 | Jamie Flemming | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $274 |
38 | Eric Miedema | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $239 |
39 | Kory Lee Urban | Huron, SD 57350 | $187 |
40 | Payton Binger | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”