Conservation Reserve Program in Beadle County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 372
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Beadle County, South Dakota totaled $3,772,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | April Marshall | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $34,005 |
22 | Joseph Gruntmeir | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $33,783 |
23 | David John Vanede | Elkton, SD 57026 | $32,382 |
24 | Joni Lee Legrand | Virgil, SD 57379 | $31,714 |
25 | Foster Creek Farms LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $30,664 |
26 | Michael A Fuchs Living Trust | Huron, SD 57350 | $30,227 |
27 | Richard G Rick Boomsma | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $29,784 |
28 | William J Chase | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $28,860 |
29 | Douglas Boomsma | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $27,808 |
30 | Joan E Brooks | Omaha, NE 68135 | $27,181 |
31 | Kimberlee Herrmann | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $25,704 |
32 | Noreen Ellen French | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $25,445 |
33 | Greg Eichstadt | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $25,311 |
34 | Orville G Doering | Cavour, SD 57324 | $25,307 |
35 | Larry Ray Gordon | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $24,340 |
36 | Michael Tschetter | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $24,274 |
37 | Steven And Lavonne Schaeffer Living Trust - Steven | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $24,188 |
38 | Delbert Henry Klicker | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $24,157 |
39 | Russell Overbay | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $24,115 |
40 | Luke Serck | Yankton, SD 57078 | $23,972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”