Total Emergency Relief Program in Beadle County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 409
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Beadle County, South Dakota totaled $14,499,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kopfmann Partnership | Alpena, SD 57312 | $331,882 |
2 | Stuart Neuharth | Alpena, SD 57312 | $276,587 |
3 | Bj Mcneil | Huron, SD 57350 | $250,000 |
4 | Gregory Alan Bich | Cavour, SD 57324 | $243,005 |
5 | Gary Hofer | Huron, SD 57350 | $235,345 |
6 | Kirk A Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $231,796 |
7 | Krista J Hiles | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $228,642 |
8 | Gerad Allan Puterbaugh | Cavour, SD 57324 | $216,281 |
9 | Andrew T Boomsma | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $204,323 |
10 | Tony Hiles | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $203,011 |
11 | Hiles Farms Inc | Wolsey, SD 57384 | $197,782 |
12 | Miranda Jae Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $176,769 |
13 | Brian Jerald Baum | Alpena, SD 57312 | $167,511 |
14 | Douglas Howard Jones | Alpena, SD 57312 | $167,411 |
15 | William Stuart Chaplin | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $161,103 |
16 | Kleinsasser Farms LLC | Huron, SD 57350 | $161,072 |
17 | John Harvey Derksen | Huron, SD 57350 | $160,058 |
18 | Jonnie Zvonek | Wessington, SD 57381 | $159,519 |
19 | Patridge Partners A South Dakota | Wessington, SD 57381 | $158,813 |
20 | Mitchell Eric Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $155,567 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>