Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Bennett County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 329
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Bennett County, South Dakota totaled $7,461,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mr Larry Lee May | Interior, SD 57750 | $53,884 |
42 | Roy Risse | Martin, SD 57551 | $53,075 |
43 | David L Bakley | Martin, SD 57551 | $52,820 |
44 | West River Partnership | Corsica, SD 57328 | $51,600 |
45 | Jeffrey Johnson | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $49,445 |
46 | Roddy Kirk | Cody, NE 69211 | $49,397 |
47 | Novotny Brothers | Batesland, SD 57716 | $48,650 |
48 | Thomas G Ward | Martin, SD 57551 | $48,619 |
49 | Kalen Wayne Harris | Martin, SD 57551 | $47,865 |
50 | Klay Robert Harris | Martin, SD 57551 | $47,800 |
51 | Patrick Leroy Rous | Batesland, SD 57716 | $47,702 |
52 | Daniel O'neill | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $47,542 |
53 | Ireland Land Corporation | Martin, SD 57551 | $45,818 |
54 | Steven Rous | Martin, SD 57551 | $44,007 |
55 | J Pauly Farming Inc | Martin, SD 57551 | $42,572 |
56 | Cook Cattle Company LLC | Martin, SD 57551 | $41,012 |
57 | Robert Scherer | Martin, SD 57551 | $40,919 |
58 | Christopher Knecht | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $40,635 |
59 | James H Good | Martin, SD 57551 | $39,522 |
60 | Leo James Goss Jr | Martin, SD 57551 | $39,456 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”