Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Bennett County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 211
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Bennett County, South Dakota totaled $3,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Carl Novotny | Martin, SD 57551 | $12,546 |
82 | Eric O Gropper | Long Valley, SD 57547 | $12,401 |
83 | Jerry Walker | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $11,747 |
84 | Daniel T Fanning | Martin, SD 57551 | $11,610 |
85 | Brad Porch | Wanblee, SD 57577 | $11,585 |
86 | Kelly Wade Boomer | Allen, SD 57714 | $11,506 |
87 | C & J Ranch Account | Norris, SD 57560 | $11,357 |
88 | Winters Family Trust | Batesland, SD 57716 | $10,628 |
89 | Bryan Kent Cuny | Allen, SD 57714 | $10,571 |
90 | Kory Layne Rayhill | Martin, SD 57551 | $10,524 |
91 | Shayne Cyrus Porch | Wanblee, SD 57577 | $10,453 |
92 | Joel W Walker | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $10,448 |
93 | Mark S Walker Jr Revocable Family Trust | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $10,273 |
94 | Christine Stanko | Scottsbluff, NE 69363 | $10,210 |
95 | Luke Meeks | Interior, SD 57750 | $9,877 |
96 | Ralph Roy Porch | Wanblee, SD 57577 | $9,544 |
97 | Timmerman Brothers Ranch | Springfield, NE 68059 | $9,464 |
98 | Leonard J Novak | Rapid City, SD 57703 | $9,075 |
99 | Christopher Knecht | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $8,980 |
100 | Whitney Lynn O'rourke | Interior, SD 57750 | $8,796 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”