Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Bennett County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 287
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Bennett County, South Dakota totaled $5,588,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ireland Brothers | Martin, SD 57551 | $160,319 |
2 | Geersen Ranch LLC | Martin, SD 57551 | $138,455 |
3 | Forrest Stewart | Cody, NE 69211 | $137,219 |
4 | Bonnie Risse | Martin, SD 57551 | $132,027 |
5 | Slattery Brothers Inc | Martin, SD 57551 | $104,927 |
6 | Jeffrey Johnson | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $101,905 |
7 | Kevin Hodson | Martin, SD 57551 | $98,488 |
8 | Livermont Brothers Incorporated | Martin, SD 57551 | $89,645 |
9 | Huddleston Cattle Company | Martin, SD 57551 | $86,117 |
10 | Donovan Farms LLC | Tuthill, SD 57574 | $83,725 |
11 | Mr Larry Lee May | Interior, SD 57750 | $81,652 |
12 | Matthew T Porch | Wanblee, SD 57577 | $79,033 |
13 | Merle E Hicks | Martin, SD 57551 | $78,973 |
14 | Wayne Heath | Cody, NE 69211 | $77,395 |
15 | J-p Cattle Partnership | Martin, SD 57551 | $77,071 |
16 | O'neill Cattle Company | Cody, NE 69211 | $73,918 |
17 | Charles Divan | Martin, SD 57551 | $73,851 |
18 | O'neill Farms Inc | Cody, NE 69211 | $72,800 |
19 | Brett Heath | Martin, SD 57551 | $68,997 |
20 | Roger L Sieck | Hill City, SD 57745 | $64,920 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>