Total Conservation Programs in Bon Homme County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 335
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Bon Homme County, South Dakota totaled $1,662,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jean Rokusek-hunhoff | Yankton, SD 57078 | $4,952 |
102 | Jeffrey F Simek | Los Ranchos De Albuq, NM 87107 | $4,797 |
103 | Mary Brandt | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $4,785 |
104 | Terry Wormsbecker | Avon, SD 57315 | $4,714 |
105 | Lyn Wagner | Scotland, SD 57059 | $4,677 |
106 | Bon Homme Conservation District | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $4,616 |
107 | Ringneck Partnership | Yankton, SD 57078 | $4,608 |
108 | Steven Ellis | Tabor, SD 57063 | $4,580 |
109 | Curtis L Nielsen | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $4,484 |
110 | Kenneth Hoff | Conrad, IA 50621 | $4,379 |
111 | Willis Hoff | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $4,379 |
112 | Amy Cooper | Springfield, SD 57062 | $4,332 |
113 | David Kriz | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $4,252 |
114 | Carol Arment | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $4,241 |
115 | Irene Eben | Avon, SD 57315 | $4,225 |
116 | Coffee Creek Cattle Company LLC | Springfield, SD 57062 | $4,045 |
117 | David Baker | Scotland, SD 57059 | $4,028 |
118 | High Caliber Ranch LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $4,022 |
119 | Stoebner Jack And Ronda Living Trust | Eagle River, AK 99577 | $3,953 |
120 | June Namminga | Lynden, WA 98264 | $3,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”