Total Conservation Programs in Bon Homme County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 335
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Bon Homme County, South Dakota totaled $1,662,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Konrad Finck | Lancaster, PA 17601 | $2,469 |
162 | Kevin Carda | Tripp, SD 57376 | $2,468 |
163 | Morris L Radack | Avon, SD 57315 | $2,436 |
164 | Marilyn Kokesh | Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 | $2,380 |
165 | Terry Sestak | Tabor, SD 57063 | $2,348 |
166 | Dorothy Burfeindt Irrevocable Real Estate Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $2,304 |
167 | Erik Alan Johnson | Avon, SD 57315 | $2,293 |
168 | Gary Sestak | Tabor, SD 57063 | $2,239 |
169 | Dale Kozak | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $2,218 |
170 | Diane K Boheman | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $2,214 |
171 | Arlen Brandt | Emery, SD 57332 | $2,214 |
172 | Barbara L Jessen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $2,157 |
173 | David John Wiebenga | Avon, SD 57315 | $2,150 |
174 | Johnnie Ebeling | Yankton, SD 57078 | $2,145 |
175 | Jared Schortzman | Scotland, SD 57059 | $2,143 |
176 | Samuel S Hajek | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $2,080 |
177 | James C Kokes | Tabor, SD 57063 | $2,068 |
178 | Jerry Bohlmann | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $2,020 |
179 | Jerry Pesek | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $1,999 |
180 | Naomi R Rueb | Omaha, NE 68138 | $1,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”