Farm Subsidy information
Bon Homme County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Bon Homme County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1,821 to 1,840 of 2,655
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bon Homme County, South Dakota totaled $339,365,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1821 | Brad Swenson | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $3,578 |
1822 | Roger Pietz | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $3,562 |
1823 | Timothy M Saulsbury | Sioux City, IA 51108 | $3,560 |
1824 | Thomas J Forchtner | Oklahoma City, OK 73195 | $3,553 |
1825 | Garry L Nielsen | Niobrara, NE 68760 | $3,545 |
1826 | Lillian Krovoza Estate | Yankton, SD 57078 | $3,542 |
1827 | Deborah L Einrem | Springfield, SD 57062 | $3,538 |
1828 | Cheryl D Mouras | San Diego, CA 92131 | $3,502 |
1829 | Raymond Kokesh Est | Scotland, SD 57059 | $3,490 |
1830 | David J Mouras | Rocklin, CA 95765 | $3,486 |
1831 | James Ded Estate | Avon, SD 57315 | $3,482 |
1832 | Albrecht Farms Inc | Parkston, SD 57366 | $3,480 |
1833 | Gladys Thum | Scotland, SD 57059 | $3,480 |
1834 | Cheryl Fischer | Scotland, SD 57059 | $3,476 |
1835 | Alvin Winckler | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $3,474 |
1836 | Dona C Meiers | Avon, SD 57315 | $3,472 |
1837 | Scott Weber | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $3,471 |
1838 | Adolph V Slama Estate | Rapid City, SD 57709 | $3,433 |
1839 | Ernest Hento | Avon, SD 57315 | $3,424 |
1840 | First National Bank ** | Correctionville, IA 51016 | $3,396 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”