Conservation Reserve Program in Bon Homme County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 335
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Bon Homme County, South Dakota totaled $1,608,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vert V Voigt | Avon, SD 57315 | $17,951 |
22 | Bruce Pieper | Yankton, SD 57078 | $17,830 |
23 | John Fathke | Avon, SD 57315 | $17,122 |
24 | Schuurmans Revocable Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $16,769 |
25 | Mavis L Malloy | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $16,525 |
26 | Lonnie Ray Mayer | Tripp, SD 57376 | $15,477 |
27 | Rjlandco Trust | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $15,006 |
28 | Douglas Wynia | Tyndall, SD 57066 | $14,913 |
29 | Edward Kreber | Springfield, SD 57062 | $14,845 |
30 | Renae Bouza | Yankton, SD 57078 | $14,738 |
31 | Gregory Hubner | Avon, SD 57315 | $14,450 |
32 | Nancy J Sternhagen | Scotland, SD 57059 | $13,990 |
33 | Kamler Trust Dated April 10 1998 | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $13,927 |
34 | Richard Zander | Scotland, SD 57059 | $12,565 |
35 | Jacob Hoffner | Yankton, SD 57078 | $12,373 |
36 | Bob Knoll | Avon, SD 57315 | $11,853 |
37 | James Mach | Tripp, SD 57376 | $11,728 |
38 | Donald Lepp | Yankton, SD 57078 | $11,621 |
39 | Gerald G Koster | Yankton, SD 57078 | $11,621 |
40 | Kirk Family Limited Partnership | Springfield, SD 57062 | $11,110 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”