Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Brookings County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 117
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Brookings County, South Dakota totaled $193,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gordon Wayne Bruening | Brookings, SD 57006 | $12,918 |
2 | Eugene L Ponto | Elkton, SD 57026 | $11,115 |
3 | Michael Eugene Ponto | Elkton, SD 57026 | $10,344 |
4 | Charles Robert Friedrich | Aurora, SD 57002 | $9,997 |
5 | Kleinjan Farms Inc | Bruce, SD 57220 | $9,696 |
6 | Allison Farms Inc | Brookings, SD 57006 | $8,495 |
7 | Newdale Hutt Breth Inc | Elkton, SD 57026 | $6,927 |
8 | Jerseydale Farms Inc | Brookings, SD 57006 | $6,339 |
9 | Thomas Lee Murphy | White, SD 57276 | $6,140 |
10 | Triple S Farms Inc | Aurora, SD 57002 | $4,710 |
11 | Lawrence Mark Jensen | Aurora, SD 57002 | $4,569 |
12 | Koch & Sons Farms Inc | Elkton, SD 57026 | $4,451 |
13 | Darrel Pahl | Aurora, SD 57002 | $4,128 |
14 | Melvin Risty | Arlington, SD 57212 | $3,500 |
15 | Alice Estella Adee | Bruce, SD 57220 | $3,500 |
16 | Richard Lee Adee | Bruce, SD 57220 | $3,500 |
17 | Dewayne Allan Jurrens | Toronto, SD 57268 | $3,334 |
18 | Leiferman Brothers Prt | Brookings, SD 57006 | $3,176 |
19 | Ralph E Kruger | Elkton, SD 57026 | $3,143 |
20 | Robert Dravland | Brookings, SD 57006 | $2,871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>