Conservation Reserve Program in Brookings County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,231
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Brookings County, South Dakota totaled $71,067,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gary W Jensen | Brookings, SD 57006 | $788,711 |
2 | Duane Emmett | Brookings, SD 57006 | $720,111 |
3 | Keith Tarrell | Bruce, SD 57220 | $663,244 |
4 | Peter Herman Leiferman | Brookings, SD 57006 | $650,082 |
5 | Vaske Farms LLC | Elkton, SD 57026 | $629,794 |
6 | Cynthia A Jacobson Rev Trust | Volga, SD 57071 | $620,807 |
7 | Scott Underwood | Brookings, SD 57006 | $571,215 |
8 | David E Spaulding | Brookings, SD 57006 | $525,705 |
9 | Cedar Breaks Ranch Llp | Brookings, SD 57006 | $490,724 |
10 | Henry G Brands | Bruce, SD 57220 | $487,631 |
11 | Roger Phillips | Brookings, SD 57006 | $469,634 |
12 | Michael Kjellsen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $468,187 |
13 | Brookings Deuel Rws | Toronto, SD 57268 | $446,469 |
14 | James Gilkerson | Brookings, SD 57006 | $431,089 |
15 | William Gibbons | Brookings, SD 57006 | $424,923 |
16 | Duane C Pankratz | Freeman, SD 57029 | $408,791 |
17 | Triple K Farms LLC | Brookings, SD 57006 | $407,426 |
18 | Marylou Goodfellow Living Revocable Trust | Bruce, SD 57220 | $399,608 |
19 | Colburn Family Revocable Living T | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $393,144 |
20 | John E Leiferman | White, SD 57276 | $392,752 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>