Total Conservation Programs in Brown County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 735
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Brown County, South Dakota totaled $8,236,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Allbee Limited Partnership | Maple Grove, MN 55369 | $16,370 |
162 | Dale Curtis Groop | Frederick, SD 57441 | $16,320 |
163 | Leland & Vickie Albrecht Living Trust | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $16,189 |
164 | Nick Berbos Real Estate Limited Partnership | Port Charlotte, FL 33948 | $16,086 |
165 | Larry V Cutler | Claremont, SD 57432 | $16,051 |
166 | Randy Bushby | Hecla, SD 57446 | $15,868 |
167 | Connie Jacobs | Pierre, SD 57501 | $15,770 |
168 | James L Sumption | Frederick, SD 57441 | $15,604 |
169 | Locken Farms | Bath, SD 57427 | $15,367 |
170 | Jeff Forsting | Columbia, SD 57433 | $15,270 |
171 | Eileen M Schuelke Irrevocable Trust | Groton, SD 57445 | $15,127 |
172 | Steve Voeller | Frederick, SD 57441 | $15,078 |
173 | Lyle L Mullner | Cheyenne, WY 82001 | $15,060 |
174 | Stiles & Byron LLC | Aberdeen, SD 57402 | $14,952 |
175 | Randy Dennert | Westport, SD 57481 | $14,877 |
176 | Maisey Joi Fees-spellman | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $14,857 |
177 | Richard Dinger | Portland, OR 97229 | $14,662 |
178 | Thomas A Karlen | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $14,654 |
179 | Douglas A Dunker | Prescott, AZ 86301 | $14,625 |
180 | Jean M Rahja | Frederick, SD 57441 | $14,617 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”