Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Brule County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Brule County, South Dakota totaled $401,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Frank Bieberly | Fort Defiance, AZ 86504 | $7,440 |
22 | Betty J Carsten | Kimball, SD 57355 | $7,162 |
23 | Frank A Bailey | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $6,618 |
24 | Kelli Stofferahn-muck | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $6,545 |
25 | Jerry Konechne | Kimball, SD 57355 | $6,379 |
26 | Todd Reinesch | Kimball, SD 57355 | $6,143 |
27 | Dennis Holan | Kimball, SD 57355 | $5,270 |
28 | Alvin L Dolezal Estate | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $5,019 |
29 | Daniel James Meier | White Lake, SD 57383 | $4,936 |
30 | Leheska Farms Inc | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $4,857 |
31 | Wade Blasius | Kimball, SD 57355 | $4,731 |
32 | Michael O Smith | Kimball, SD 57355 | $4,724 |
33 | Justin Blasius | Kimball, SD 57355 | $4,410 |
34 | Dennis Leiferman | Kimball, SD 57355 | $4,392 |
35 | Garry Leiferman | Kimball, SD 57355 | $4,339 |
36 | Daniel A Kott | Platte, SD 57369 | $3,524 |
37 | David- David R Kott R Kott | Platte, SD 57369 | $3,418 |
38 | Scott Olson | Corsica, SD 57328 | $3,333 |
39 | Robert Kunzweiler | Kimball, SD 57355 | $2,710 |
40 | Kent Geppert | Kimball, SD 57355 | $2,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”