Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Brule County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 244
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Brule County, South Dakota totaled $2,918,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mr Christopher James Konechne | Kimball, SD 57355 | $10,342 |
102 | Dennis L Urban | Kimball, SD 57355 | $10,339 |
103 | Robert Kunzweiler | Kimball, SD 57355 | $10,247 |
104 | Rick Pazour | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $10,076 |
105 | Joe Pazour | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $10,076 |
106 | Donald Randall | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $10,020 |
107 | Lucas Palmer | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $9,822 |
108 | Kent Geppert | Kimball, SD 57355 | $9,642 |
109 | Edwin Piskule Jr | Kimball, SD 57355 | $9,452 |
110 | Leroy T Steiger | Kimball, SD 57355 | $9,371 |
111 | Douglas Dolezal | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $9,070 |
112 | Michael O Smith | Kimball, SD 57355 | $8,918 |
113 | Ronnie Reimer | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $8,868 |
114 | Daniel James Meier | White Lake, SD 57383 | $8,845 |
115 | John Tyrrell | Kimball, SD 57355 | $8,720 |
116 | Chad Olson | Kimball, SD 57355 | $8,574 |
117 | Joseph I Smith | Kimball, SD 57355 | $8,492 |
118 | Craig Rosenberger | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $8,312 |
119 | Donald Husman Jr | Kimball, SD 57355 | $8,259 |
120 | Gary Feltman | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $8,239 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”