Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Buffalo County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Buffalo County, South Dakota totaled $1,094,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | The Boys | Yankton, SD 57078 | $16,143 |
22 | John W Naser | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $15,823 |
23 | Broadaxe Ranch LLC | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $15,423 |
24 | Rex Zastrow | Miller, SD 57362 | $14,730 |
25 | David Allen Fuegen | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $14,299 |
26 | Katie Kay Richardson | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $13,680 |
27 | Barry Dean Knippling | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $13,285 |
28 | Terry Lynn Von Eye | Miller, SD 57362 | $13,088 |
29 | Jesse Larsen | Kimball, SD 57355 | $12,953 |
30 | Lloyd Lutter | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $12,605 |
31 | Matthew J Sinkie | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $10,570 |
32 | Augustine C Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $10,468 |
33 | Stephen Larsen | Kimball, SD 57355 | $10,054 |
34 | Andrew Zastrow | Miller, SD 57362 | $9,621 |
35 | Derek Charles Zastrow | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $8,977 |
36 | Harley R Cable | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $7,032 |
37 | Jeffrey Fuegen | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $6,781 |
38 | Chuck Mines | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $6,768 |
39 | Roger Von Eye | Miller, SD 57362 | $6,003 |
40 | Richard J Sinkie | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $3,181 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”