Farm Subsidy information
Buffalo County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Buffalo County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 76
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Buffalo County, South Dakota totaled $6,025,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knippling Land & Cattle Inc | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $147,356 |
| 2 | Terry Lynn Von Eye | Miller, SD 57362 | $84,218 |
| 3 | Daly Farm Partnership | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $61,879 |
| 4 | Kathleen Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $52,906 |
| 5 | Thompson Family Farms LLC | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $48,588 |
| 6 | Dj Land & Cattle LLC | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $39,340 |
| 7 | Barry Dean Knippling | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $36,342 |
| 8 | Augustine C Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $35,709 |
| 9 | Knippling Hereford LLC | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $35,079 |
| 10 | Mason Daly | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $22,280 |
| 11 | Robert C Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $21,065 |
| 12 | Wendstar Holdings Limited Partnership | Fredericksbrg, IA 50630 | $18,999 |
| 13 | Danielle Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $18,870 |
| 14 | , | $18,428 | |
| 15 | David Allen Fuegen | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $18,157 |
| 16 | , | $17,908 | |
| 17 | Rodney L Larsen | Kimball, SD 57355 | $16,701 |
| 18 | , | $15,975 | |
| 19 | Rex Zastrow | Miller, SD 57362 | $14,026 |
| 20 | Tate Von Eye | Kimball, SD 57355 | $13,719 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
