Farm Subsidy information
Butte County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Butte County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 397
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $14,233,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | , | $31,579 | |
102 | Jeff Horman | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $31,419 |
103 | Keith Franke | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $31,072 |
104 | Capp Brothers Ranch LLC | Nisland, SD 57762 | $30,419 |
105 | Timothy D Reich | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $30,336 |
106 | Casey Holmes | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $30,085 |
107 | Dustin Braun | Newell, SD 57760 | $29,924 |
108 | Finn Livestock Company | Nisland, SD 57762 | $29,661 |
109 | Ww Thompson & Sons Inc | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $29,628 |
110 | Ed A Baker | Newell, SD 57760 | $29,560 |
111 | Mecaha Cattle Co | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $28,967 |
112 | Bernadette Marie Barnaud | Nisland, SD 57762 | $28,962 |
113 | Neal Mccoy | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $28,956 |
114 | Louis L Lemmel | Mud Butte, SD 57758 | $28,386 |
115 | Brian Budmayr | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $28,245 |
116 | Victor Reid | Nisland, SD 57762 | $27,867 |
117 | Todd A Williamson | Newell, SD 57760 | $27,483 |
118 | Center Of Nation Cattle Company Inc | Newell, SD 57760 | $27,473 |
119 | Delwyn M Raisanen | Newell, SD 57760 | $25,999 |
120 | Dan Conner | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $25,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”