Total Disaster Programs in Butte County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 272
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $2,923,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Curtis R Westland | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,915 |
122 | Kolby Wickwire | Aladdin, WY 82710 | $1,899 |
123 | Brett Crowser | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,872 |
124 | Waite Ranch Lllp | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,855 |
125 | Gerard Paul Cuka | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,847 |
126 | Donald H Turbiville | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $1,844 |
127 | Jaymi M Meeks | Lantry, SD 57636 | $1,842 |
128 | Tel Evan Koan | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $1,757 |
129 | Randal T Vallery | Nisland, SD 57762 | $1,739 |
130 | Tony Penner | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,706 |
131 | Yolonda J Schledewitz-long | Enning, SD 57737 | $1,701 |
132 | Daniel J Oehler Dba Bar H Ranch | Bullhead City, AZ 86442 | $1,580 |
133 | Shannon Wade Wiggers | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,555 |
134 | Robert A Henwood | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,545 |
135 | W Steven Mcamis | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,534 |
136 | Branden Lee Moos | Philip, SD 57567 | $1,504 |
137 | Iver J Heier | Prairie City, SD 57649 | $1,489 |
138 | Lane Lamphere | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $1,446 |
139 | Jefferson J Long | Enning, SD 57737 | $1,417 |
140 | , | $1,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”