Total Conservation Programs in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 308
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $15,627,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Debbie E Van Kley | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $20,839 |
122 | George Lermeny Revocable Trust | Reva, SD 57651 | $20,097 |
123 | Ardis Lermeny Revocable Trust | Buffalo, SD 57720 | $20,097 |
124 | Ed A Baker | Newell, SD 57760 | $20,027 |
125 | Owl Butte South Dakota LLC | Absarokee, MT 59001 | $19,254 |
126 | Art Heitz Jr | Box Elder, SD 57719 | $19,057 |
127 | Maureen Heitz | Vale, SD 57788 | $19,057 |
128 | Dale Morman | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $19,046 |
129 | Bob D Lewis | Nisland, SD 57762 | $19,003 |
130 | Dan Conner | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $18,608 |
131 | , | $18,608 | |
132 | Bruce G Crago | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $18,081 |
133 | Mary Ellen Lantis Trust | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $17,824 |
134 | Wendt Ranches Inc | Newell, SD 57760 | $17,790 |
135 | J H Welling Trust | Chadron, NE 69337 | $17,632 |
136 | Jeff Horman | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $17,557 |
137 | Deborah L Kukuchka | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $17,520 |
138 | William Craig Kukuchka | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $17,520 |
139 | Peter L Buer | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $17,497 |
140 | Donna L Buer | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $17,497 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”