Deficiency Payment in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 183
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $307,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Wendt Ranches Inc | Newell, SD 57760 | $0 |
162 | Kling Ranch Ptr | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $0 |
163 | Will Lantis | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $0 |
164 | Mark Olson | Hill City, SD 57745 | $0 |
165 | Delwyn M Raisanen | Newell, SD 57760 | $0 |
166 | Philip A Severson | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $0 |
167 | Mary Ellen Lantis | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $0 |
168 | Keith Franke | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $0 |
169 | Ervin Kirksey | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $0 |
170 | Leo Ahonen | Newell, SD 57760 | $0 |
171 | Janet M Hensley | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $0 |
172 | John Albert Nelson | Newell, SD 57760 | $0 |
173 | Brian Franke | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $0 |
174 | Deborah L Kukuchka | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $0 |
175 | William Craig Kukuchka | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $0 |
176 | Gardners Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $0 |
177 | Barry Ted Richardson | Fort Meade, SD 57741 | $0 |
178 | Cal I Anderson | Newell, SD 57760 | $0 |
179 | Esther Kling Estate | Gillette, WY 82716 | $-31 |
180 | Jason Kling | Nisland, SD 57762 | $-63 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”