Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 396
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $5,555,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Johnson Sheep And Cattle LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $172,181 |
2 | Tatanka Farms Llp | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $128,734 |
3 | Guy Casteel | Newell, SD 57760 | $114,016 |
4 | Cox Farms LLC | Vale, SD 57788 | $110,021 |
5 | H L Brunner & Sons | Vale, SD 57788 | $95,393 |
6 | Daniel S Long | Waynesboro, PA 17268 | $89,506 |
7 | Bar 69 Angus Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $86,984 |
8 | Brent Preslicka | Newell, SD 57760 | $85,085 |
9 | John Orwick | Newell, SD 57760 | $76,403 |
10 | Joe W Burke | Newell, SD 57760 | $71,953 |
11 | Orwick Ranch Llp | Newell, SD 57760 | $68,961 |
12 | Kudlock Ranch LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $68,391 |
13 | Dane Dobesh | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $67,987 |
14 | Bruce G Crago | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $66,990 |
15 | Paul J Erk | Newell, SD 57760 | $66,942 |
16 | Rebecca J Boylan | Newell, SD 57760 | $63,181 |
17 | Ross Pittman | Nisland, SD 57762 | $60,460 |
18 | Chris A Kling | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $60,060 |
19 | Crago Land & Livestock | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $56,705 |
20 | Robert S Boylan | Newell, SD 57760 | $54,968 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>