Conservation Reserve Program in Charles Mix County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 487
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Charles Mix County, South Dakota totaled $2,425,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Lori Lee Litzen | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $4,425 |
142 | Sarah Storm | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $4,418 |
143 | Michael Lee Medricky | Dante, SD 57329 | $4,300 |
144 | Eugene John & Barbara Slaba Living Trust | Wagner, SD 57380 | $4,265 |
145 | Vincent E Wolph | Fostoria, OH 44830 | $4,196 |
146 | , | $4,182 | |
147 | Cleone Leistra | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $4,127 |
148 | Everine M Schipper Living Trust | Platte, SD 57369 | $4,100 |
149 | Keith Kuca | Dante, SD 57329 | $4,083 |
150 | Travis Enterprises Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $4,046 |
151 | Randall Lee Rysavy | Wagner, SD 57380 | $3,992 |
152 | Russell J Rysavy | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $3,992 |
153 | Maybrook Farm LLC | Wagner, SD 57380 | $3,924 |
154 | David Kotab | Wagner, SD 57380 | $3,859 |
155 | Mary L Antelope-stotz | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $3,799 |
156 | , | $3,752 | |
157 | Wayne Blair | Geddes, SD 57342 | $3,748 |
158 | , | $3,746 | |
159 | Keith R Porter | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $3,696 |
160 | Sally Winter | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $3,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”