Farm Subsidy information

Charles Mix County, South Dakota

Total Subsidies in Charles Mix County, South Dakota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,165

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Charles Mix County, South Dakota totaled $571,110,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1River View FarmsPlatte, SD 57369$8,877,578
2Platte Hutterian Brethren IncPlatte, SD 57369$4,917,916
3Clearfield Hutterian Brethren IncDelmont, SD 57330$3,791,416
4Lakeview Hutterian Brethren IncLake Andes, SD 57356$3,779,917
5Mhc Land And Cattle Ltd Dba Christiansen Land & CKimball, SD 57355$3,739,103
6CuzPlatte, SD 57369$2,762,299
7Foxley BrothersPlatte, SD 57369$2,673,442
8David B KnollPlatte, SD 57369$2,139,868
9Fischer FarmsWagner, SD 57380$1,996,036
10Prairie Valley Farm IncPlatte, SD 57369$1,913,680
11Scott Farms IncGeddes, SD 57342$1,735,367
12James A EricksonPlatte, SD 57369$1,676,008
13Bryce L FoxleyPlatte, SD 57369$1,669,726
14Olson Grain IncPlatte, SD 57369$1,667,899
15Pheifer Farms LtdPlatte, SD 57369$1,657,913
16C Dale Sybesma Farm IncPlatte, SD 57369$1,623,593
17Vanzee Ranch & Feed Lot IncPlatte, SD 57369$1,610,882
18Gary NelsonGeddes, SD 57342$1,607,532
19Deh Land & Cattle CompanyPlatte, SD 57369$1,600,063
20Raymond Paul JohannesonLake Andes, SD 57356$1,561,844

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag