Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Charles Mix County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 424
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Charles Mix County, South Dakota totaled $5,350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hogan Honey Farms Inc | Geddes, SD 57342 | $706,819 |
2 | Strehlow Bees Inc | Geddes, SD 57342 | $690,062 |
3 | Tim W Hollmann | Dante, SD 57329 | $560,785 |
4 | Ross Michael Beeson | Dante, SD 57329 | $160,366 |
5 | Greger Bee Farms Inc | Geddes, SD 57342 | $147,090 |
6 | Mhc Land And Cattle Ltd Dba Christiansen Land & C | Kimball, SD 57355 | $144,339 |
7 | Nachtigal Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $76,599 |
8 | Bruce C Moehling | Wagner, SD 57380 | $73,291 |
9 | Vern E Koupal | Dante, SD 57329 | $67,186 |
10 | Richard Allen Greger | Geddes, SD 57342 | $49,104 |
11 | Platte Hutterian Brethren Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $43,070 |
12 | Colin Soukup | Wagner, SD 57380 | $40,802 |
13 | Daniel Thomas Koupal | Dante, SD 57329 | $38,387 |
14 | Van Duysen Ranch LLC | Wagner, SD 57380 | $38,030 |
15 | Wynia Ranch Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $37,930 |
16 | Mike Beeson | Dante, SD 57329 | $37,906 |
17 | Duke Luvern Starr | Geddes, SD 57342 | $34,475 |
18 | Vance Qualm | Platte, SD 57369 | $33,631 |
19 | Terry Gene Beeson | Dante, SD 57329 | $30,724 |
20 | Robertson Stock Farm II LLC | Wagner, SD 57380 | $30,663 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>