Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 418
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, South Dakota totaled $3,439,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ct Wildlife Management Partnership | Saint Paul, MN 55125 | $59,855 |
2 | Norma Wahl | De Soto, KS 66018 | $49,596 |
3 | N N Fischer Family Limited Partnership | Saint Paul, MN 55105 | $47,741 |
4 | Lori Elie | Clark, SD 57225 | $45,350 |
5 | , | $44,369 | |
6 | James Paulson | Garden City, SD 57236 | $38,886 |
7 | Joyce Fjelland | Clark, SD 57225 | $35,284 |
8 | Robert L Brown | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $32,520 |
9 | Michael J Deaner | Osceola, WI 54020 | $31,973 |
10 | Kathleen A Zastrow | Osceola, WI 54020 | $31,973 |
11 | Mary Bowers | Raymond, SD 57258 | $29,930 |
12 | Lohr Family Llp | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $29,896 |
13 | Valberg Irrevocable Trust | Bradley, SD 57217 | $29,343 |
14 | Michalski Cattle LLC | Willow Lake, SD 57278 | $28,772 |
15 | Dkh Farms Inc | Conde, SD 57434 | $28,570 |
16 | Robert L Seefeldt | Clark, SD 57225 | $27,416 |
17 | Ray S Hanson | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $27,408 |
18 | Steven Jerome Huber | Conde, SD 57434 | $27,265 |
19 | Thomas E Hallberg | Clark, SD 57225 | $26,800 |
20 | Lorna Baldwin | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $26,445 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>