Farm Subsidy information
Clark County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Clark County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 721
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clark County, South Dakota totaled $27,674,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jarred William Lamb | Clark, SD 57225 | $63,189 |
22 | Nina Frances Lamb | Hazel, SD 57242 | $62,252 |
23 | James Allan Caulfield Jr | Bradley, SD 57217 | $61,301 |
24 | Ryan Adam Caulfield | Wallace, SD 57272 | $60,275 |
25 | Ct Wildlife Management Partnership | Saint Paul, MN 55125 | $59,855 |
26 | , | $57,355 | |
27 | John Charles Maynard | Clark, SD 57225 | $55,623 |
28 | Michalski Cattle LLC | Willow Lake, SD 57278 | $55,445 |
29 | Alan Yexley | Stockholm, SD 57264 | $54,298 |
30 | Jason Thomas Lamb | Hazel, SD 57242 | $54,134 |
31 | Woodland Grain Farms LLC | Clark, SD 57225 | $54,029 |
32 | Paul Francis Florey | Clark, SD 57225 | $53,422 |
33 | Joseph Raymond Arthur | South Shore, SD 57263 | $52,643 |
34 | John Erick Arthur | Clark, SD 57225 | $52,642 |
35 | Mark Lee Mc Henry | Clark, SD 57225 | $51,462 |
36 | Obermeier Ranch Llp | Clark, SD 57225 | $50,996 |
37 | Fergus Lee Nelson | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $50,849 |
38 | James Paulson | Garden City, SD 57236 | $50,795 |
39 | N N Fischer Family Limited Partnership | Saint Paul, MN 55105 | $50,701 |
40 | Lori Elie | Clark, SD 57225 | $50,455 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”