Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,336
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, South Dakota totaled $70,840,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Barry Threadgold | Hurdsfield, ND 58451 | $172,134 |
102 | Mark Maynard | Watertown, SD 57201 | $171,070 |
103 | Tedco LLC | Watertown, SD 57201 | $168,737 |
104 | Brent Leslie Anderson | Clark, SD 57225 | $167,348 |
105 | Lowell Wahl | Clark, SD 57225 | $166,973 |
106 | Ted R Horning | Watertown, SD 57201 | $165,184 |
107 | Opsahl Farms LLC | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $162,264 |
108 | Valberg Irrevocable Trust | Bradley, SD 57217 | $161,186 |
109 | Brown-holen-brown | Brainerd, MN 56401 | $160,043 |
110 | Gary Peterson | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $159,491 |
111 | Leonard W Makens | Rcho Santa Fe, CA 92067 | $158,863 |
112 | Steve R Wicks | Clark, SD 57225 | $156,376 |
113 | Harris Anthony Kasin | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $155,303 |
114 | Michael Bjerke | Bruce, SD 57220 | $155,177 |
115 | William D Nielsen | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $154,880 |
116 | John A Graves | Raymond, SD 57258 | $154,738 |
117 | Kenneth A Rich Trust | Inver Grove, MN 55076 | $153,925 |
118 | Ronny Ray Walker | Clark, SD 57225 | $153,830 |
119 | Harry Hanson | Vienna, SD 57271 | $153,641 |
120 | Edward Chapin | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $153,457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”