Market Gains in Clark County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 200
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Clark County, South Dakota totaled $3,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Mona Anne Schlagel | Clark, SD 57225 | $995 |
162 | St Marys Indian Mission | Dunseith, ND 58329 | $988 |
163 | George Dewayne Moe | Bradley, SD 57217 | $980 |
164 | Ronald Joseph Holiday | Durbin, ND 58059 | $961 |
165 | Jerry Kirkeby | Vienna, SD 57271 | $908 |
166 | Mabelle Jeanette Nelson | Watertown, SD 57201 | $844 |
167 | Richard L Paulson | Clark, SD 57225 | $810 |
168 | Curtis Bryce Warkenthien | Clark, SD 57225 | $780 |
169 | Lavonne Shirley Rinerson | Watertown, SD 57201 | $779 |
170 | Curtis Leedean Peterson | Vienna, SD 57271 | $703 |
171 | John Oscar Foiles | Raymond, SD 57258 | $698 |
172 | John Lee Mills | Clark, SD 57225 | $687 |
173 | Jody Lynn Foster | Henry, SD 57243 | $672 |
174 | Thomas Joe Foster | Henry, SD 57243 | $672 |
175 | Mike Waldner | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $646 |
176 | Kenneth E Tarbox | Bradley, SD 57217 | $626 |
177 | Roger E Murray | Garden City, SD 57236 | $605 |
178 | Justin James Burke | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $585 |
179 | Emogene Peterson | Vienna, SD 57271 | $550 |
180 | Harris Anthony Kasin | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $541 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”