Market Loss Assistance Program in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,057
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $9,170,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Reid Matthew Jensen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $49,677 |
22 | Jeffrey Dean Heidebrecht | Beresford, SD 57004 | $49,448 |
23 | Gregg Stephen Erickson | Burbank, SD 57010 | $48,962 |
24 | Gary Eugene Peterson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $48,638 |
25 | Sheridan Orland Sternquist | Centerville, SD 57014 | $48,498 |
26 | Swee Incorporated | Burbank, SD 57010 | $48,421 |
27 | Gary Freeburg | Gayville, SD 57031 | $48,415 |
28 | Daniel Joseph Heine | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $48,368 |
29 | Knutson Farms Partnership | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $48,042 |
30 | Dale Ellwyn Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $45,932 |
31 | Robert George Fallan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $45,054 |
32 | Franklin Fredrick Orr | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $44,792 |
33 | Calvin Hanson | Meckling, SD 57069 | $43,755 |
34 | Daniel Kay Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $43,433 |
35 | Donald Paul Larsen | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $43,322 |
36 | Michael Todd Huth | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $42,870 |
37 | Nissen Farms Inc | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $42,842 |
38 | Ronald W Huot | Centerville, SD 57014 | $41,851 |
39 | Mark David Nelson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $41,822 |
40 | Gordon Iver Andersen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $41,331 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”