Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,325
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $329,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Timothy Olin Ostrem | Centerville, SD 57014 | $762,188 |
42 | James Edward Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $748,714 |
43 | Riverside Farms Inc | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $748,573 |
44 | Charles Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $741,468 |
45 | John C Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $720,347 |
46 | Timothy Thissell | Beresford, SD 57004 | $709,413 |
47 | Richard Gene Orr | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $706,337 |
48 | Nissen Farms Inc | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $700,843 |
49 | Brook Douglas Bye | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $697,012 |
50 | Michael Dennis Manning | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $672,931 |
51 | Paul Alan Bremer | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $671,848 |
52 | Lawrence Joseph O'connor | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $642,790 |
53 | Mark Allen Hubert | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $641,682 |
54 | Jerome Allen Schmitz | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $641,463 |
55 | Mark Raymond Mollet | Burbank, SD 57010 | $640,614 |
56 | Spirit Mound Farms Inc | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $638,694 |
57 | Douglas Gene Bye | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $631,918 |
58 | David Lee Ostrem | Centerville, SD 57014 | $626,227 |
59 | Nicholas John Merrigan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $625,633 |
60 | Randy G Jensen | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $618,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”