Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Clay County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 506
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $21,929,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Hub City Farms LLC | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $53,447 |
42 | Stevan Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $53,388 |
43 | , | $51,078 | |
44 | Robert E Solomon Legacy Land Tr | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $49,165 |
45 | Ryan Olson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $49,130 |
46 | Brian Richard Jensen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $47,765 |
47 | Stacy Caroline Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $47,621 |
48 | Solomon Farms | Burbank, SD 57010 | $46,987 |
49 | Wesley Eric Stockland | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $46,754 |
50 | Adam Michael Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $46,315 |
51 | O'connell Farms LLC | Beresford, SD 57004 | $42,671 |
52 | Tamara Montieth | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $41,998 |
53 | Matthew Erl Olson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $41,795 |
54 | Roger Stockland | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $41,412 |
55 | David Lee Ostrem | Centerville, SD 57014 | $40,880 |
56 | Roger Merle Gilbertson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $40,426 |
57 | Daryl William Henriksen | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $40,099 |
58 | Donnelly Grain Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $38,663 |
59 | Michael Leonard Bottolfson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $37,780 |
60 | Michael Douglas Lundberg | Beresford, SD 57004 | $36,797 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”