Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,325
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $329,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Donnie Gene Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $618,105 |
62 | Lars G Aga | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $615,824 |
63 | 3wj Farms | Meckling, SD 57069 | $615,741 |
64 | Donald F Emmick Revocable Trust | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $609,286 |
65 | Roger Lowell Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $608,350 |
66 | Sheldon Dustin Johnson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $604,478 |
67 | Stevan Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $604,471 |
68 | Jeffrey Thad Knutson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $598,684 |
69 | Calvin Hanson | Meckling, SD 57069 | $597,506 |
70 | Daniel Joseph Heine | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $592,262 |
71 | Logue Partnership | Volin, SD 57072 | $582,520 |
72 | David Dean Olson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $581,660 |
73 | Ronald Kenneth Rederick | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $576,698 |
74 | Timothy S Gregoire | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $568,296 |
75 | Craig Curtis Jensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $567,885 |
76 | Michael Lee Hemmingson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $565,629 |
77 | Nels J Sorensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $560,847 |
78 | Dan K Huth | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $556,018 |
79 | Bryce Niel Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $556,017 |
80 | Jeffery Alan Solomon | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $555,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”