Counter Cyclical Program in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 826
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $5,883,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lawrence Lee Birgen | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $23,420 |
62 | Calvin Hanson | Meckling, SD 57069 | $22,962 |
63 | Brook Douglas Bye | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $22,903 |
64 | Gene Robert Nelsen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $22,837 |
65 | Jerome Allen Schmitz | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $22,613 |
66 | Ronald Burnell Nelsen | Volin, SD 57072 | $22,585 |
67 | Erlan Millard Olson | Burbank, SD 57010 | $22,449 |
68 | Richard Allen Peterson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $22,442 |
69 | Richard Gregoire | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $22,442 |
70 | Hubert Gregoire | Yankton, SD 57078 | $22,442 |
71 | Douglas Lundberg Estate | Beresford, SD 57004 | $22,389 |
72 | Chuck Donnelly Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,098 |
73 | Gary Freeburg | Gayville, SD 57031 | $22,012 |
74 | Michael Ardell Lovejoy | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $21,663 |
75 | Craig Daryl Johnson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $21,659 |
76 | Ronald Lynn Carlson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $21,642 |
77 | Grant Davis Sommervold | Burbank, SD 57010 | $21,558 |
78 | Swee Incorporated | Burbank, SD 57010 | $21,360 |
79 | Kyle Andreas Jensen | Meckling, SD 57069 | $21,046 |
80 | Kirk Chris Sorensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $20,636 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”