Total Commodity Programs in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,048
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $138,378,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | 3wj Farms | Meckling, SD 57069 | $511,535 |
62 | David Dean Olson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $509,921 |
63 | Logue Partnership | Volin, SD 57072 | $507,464 |
64 | Lawrence Lee Birgen | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $496,186 |
65 | Bryce Niel Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $486,860 |
66 | Donnie Gene Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $483,345 |
67 | Richard Allen Peterson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $483,192 |
68 | Michael Ray Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $479,655 |
69 | Charles Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $470,669 |
70 | Douglas Gene Bye | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $464,897 |
71 | Timothy Thissell | Beresford, SD 57004 | $462,809 |
72 | Daniel Kay Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $462,455 |
73 | Blind Creek Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $460,181 |
74 | Jeffery Alan Solomon | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $459,825 |
75 | Freeburg Hay LLC | Gayville, SD 57031 | $456,856 |
76 | Michael Dennis Manning | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $456,179 |
77 | Glyndon Knutson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $450,148 |
78 | Stevan Herbert Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $449,535 |
79 | Timothy S Gregoire | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $448,012 |
80 | Kirk Chris Sorensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $447,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”