Total Commodity Programs in Clay County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 452
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $3,990,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Donnie Gene Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $18,794 |
62 | Hub City Farms LLC | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $18,655 |
63 | Michael Douglas Lundberg | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,576 |
64 | Calvin Hanson | Meckling, SD 57069 | $18,519 |
65 | Randal Wayne Huot | Centerville, SD 57014 | $18,461 |
66 | John C Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,219 |
67 | James J Petrik | Gayville, SD 57031 | $18,183 |
68 | Lawrence Lee Birgen | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $18,049 |
69 | Marty Carl Gilbertson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $17,935 |
70 | Adam Michael Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $17,818 |
71 | Jerome Allen Schmitz | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $17,247 |
72 | Donald Francis O'connor | Burbank, SD 57010 | $17,112 |
73 | Thomas James Orr | Volin, SD 57072 | $16,787 |
74 | Dale Ellwyn Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $16,765 |
75 | Ricky Allen Wolfswinkel | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $16,306 |
76 | Matthew Erl Olson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $16,279 |
77 | Michael Ray Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $16,175 |
78 | Rian Merrigan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $16,022 |
79 | Mark Francis Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $15,967 |
80 | Kurt Thomas Amundson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $15,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”