Counter Cyclical Program in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 826
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $5,883,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michael Dennis Manning | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $20,393 |
82 | Kevin Lawrence Cusick | Burbank, SD 57010 | $20,274 |
83 | James Edward Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $20,268 |
84 | Richard V Sorensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $19,943 |
85 | Michael Ray Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $19,891 |
86 | Ronald Lynn Nelson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $19,891 |
87 | Daniel Thissell | Centerville, SD 57014 | $19,282 |
88 | Nicholas John Merrigan | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $19,117 |
89 | David Dean Olson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,855 |
90 | Timothy Thissell | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,691 |
91 | Douglas Oscar Lundberg | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,534 |
92 | Marty Carl Gilbertson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $18,188 |
93 | Donnie Gene Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $18,086 |
94 | Michael Allen Abbas | Parker, SD 57053 | $17,828 |
95 | Ronald Hesla | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $17,803 |
96 | Charles Johnson III | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $17,699 |
97 | Larry Dean Heidebrecht | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $17,654 |
98 | Dennis John Ganschow | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $17,645 |
99 | Kendal Stanley Frick | Beresford, SD 57004 | $17,643 |
100 | Leonard Francis Girard | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $17,515 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”