Loan Deficiency in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,127
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $23,712,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David Dean Olson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $78,812 |
82 | Chuck Donnelly Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $78,588 |
83 | Donnie Gene Peterson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $77,233 |
84 | Daryl Johnson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $76,532 |
85 | Kyle Andreas Jensen | Meckling, SD 57069 | $75,394 |
86 | Craig Curtis Jensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $75,306 |
87 | Bryce Niel Jensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $74,870 |
88 | Kirk Chris Sorensen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $74,381 |
89 | Grant Davis Sommervold | Burbank, SD 57010 | $72,982 |
90 | Joseph Edelen Jr | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $71,961 |
91 | Erlin Ellison | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $71,081 |
92 | Corey Clark Lewison | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $71,049 |
93 | D A Olson & Sons LLC | Meckling, SD 57069 | $70,862 |
94 | Paul T Nelson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $69,631 |
95 | Millage Vernon Madsen | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $69,614 |
96 | Robert Emmick | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $68,588 |
97 | Thomas Jay Ostrem | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $68,540 |
98 | Charles Johnson Jr | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $67,808 |
99 | Jerome Allen Schmitz | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $66,542 |
100 | Gregory C Hesla | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $66,257 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”